Sponsored
    Follow Us:

high court judgments

Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.

Latest Articles


J&K&L HC Quashes Preventive Detention of Nazir Ahmad Ronga

Corporate Law : The J&K&L HC quashed Nazir Ahmad Ronga’s detention under the Public Safety Act, citing vague allegations and lack of evidence, s...

March 18, 2025 135 Views 0 comment Print

Unsigned & DIN-Less GST Orders are Invalid: AP HC Ruling

Goods and Services Tax : AP High Court invalidates unsigned GST orders without DIN, citing CBIC guidelines. Learn key legal takeaways and compliance requir...

March 18, 2025 585 Views 0 comment Print

Analysis of Notifications and Circulars for Week ending 16th March 2025

CA, CS, CMA : Summary of tax and regulatory updates: income tax bonds, GST rulings, SEBI amendments, customs tariffs, and DGFT trade policy chan...

March 18, 2025 3573 Views 0 comment Print

Assumption That Indian Woman Won’t File False Sexual Assault Case Incorrect: Kerala HC

Corporate Law : Kerala HC quashes rape case, stressing case-specific analysis of allegations. Assumption that women won’t file false sexual assa...

March 17, 2025 258 Views 0 comment Print

GST में Voluntary Payment या Coercion? Karnataka HC का फैसला

Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC ने DGGI की ₹2.5 करोड़ की वसूली को अवैध ठहराया। जान...

March 11, 2025 510 Views 0 comment Print


Latest News


Latest Case Law Related to IBC 2016: October to December 2024

Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...

February 13, 2025 519 Views 0 comment Print

Latest Case Law Related to IBC – April to June 2024

Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...

August 14, 2024 774 Views 0 comment Print

GST payable on interest component of EMI of Credit Card loan: Calcutta HC

Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...

August 10, 2022 3096 Views 0 comment Print

Gurugugram CA arrest by GST Dept. – Submission by Dept. in Court

Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...

May 25, 2022 90438 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi HC Issues Practice Directions to Dispense with Physical Signatures on Daily Court Orders

Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...

April 29, 2022 939 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Delay Beyond 1 Month in GST Appeals Not Condonable: Chhattisgarh HC

Goods and Services Tax : Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Nandan Steels’ appeal against GST credit denial, ruling that delay beyond the prescribed limit...

March 19, 2025 15 Views 0 comment Print

Proper Service of Notice Crucial for GST Assessment Validity: Madras HC

Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court invalidates assessment order in M.Vimalraj Vs Union of India due to lack of proper notice service under GST Act....

March 19, 2025 69 Views 0 comment Print

HC Quashes Writ on GST Penalty for Non-Claim of Goods, Directs Alternative Remedy

Goods and Services Tax : The Allahabad HC dismissed HDB Financial's writ petition challenging a ₹5.4 lakh GST penalty, advising the petitioner to pursue ...

March 19, 2025 42 Views 0 comment Print

Separate GST Orders should be issued for each year Despite Composite SCN: Kerala HC

Goods and Services Tax : Kerala High Court addresses GST show cause notice to Lakshmi Mobile, focusing on separate orders and hearing opportunities....

March 19, 2025 48 Views 0 comment Print

ITC Reversal: Madras HC allows opportunity on payment of 25% of disputed taxes

Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court resolves Tvl. Arumugasamy tax case. 25% disputed tax payment allows a new hearing. Read the full order summary. ...

March 19, 2025 51 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Notifications


Bombay High Court Enforces Video Conferencing Rules

Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...

December 19, 2024 612 Views 0 comment Print

CBDT Revises Monetary Limits for Tax Income Tax Appeals

Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...

September 17, 2024 11850 Views 0 comment Print

New Video Conferencing Protocols Issued by Delhi High Court

Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...

May 20, 2024 1215 Views 0 comment Print

Instructions for AO after Adverse observations of Allahabad HC

Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...

August 7, 2022 12288 Views 2 comments Print

Delhi HC exempts lawyers from wearing gowns

Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...

February 25, 2022 3297 Views 0 comment Print


Revenue cannot recover demand to the extent of TDS deducted despite non payment by deductor

June 9, 2005 2675 Views 0 comment Print

HC held that Revenue is to be definitely restrained in terms of Section 205 of the Act from enforcing any demand on the assessee-petitioner insofar as the demand with reference to the amount of tax which had been deducted by the tenant of the assessee in the present case, and assuming that the tenant had not remitted the amount to the Central Government. The only course open to the Revenue is to recover the amount from the very person who has deducted and not from the petitioner.

Credit for TDS cannot be denied to deductee for non payment by deductor

June 9, 2005 2530 Views 0 comment Print

If we look at the scheme for the provision of deduction of tax at source, it becomes obvious that such person is acting on behalf of the Revenue, i.e.,as an agent of the Revenue. In fact, the person is enabled statutorily to make deduction and remit the amount to the Central Government, though in the instant case, the person who has deducted the amount may be the tenant or lessee of the petitioner and there is such inter se relationship as between the two,

Penalty not to be imposed unless Assessee acted deliberately in defiance of law

February 22, 2005 1891 Views 0 comment Print

The apex court in Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa had long ago settled the law that penalty is not to be ordinarily imposed unless the party either acted deliberately in defiance of law and was guilty of conduct contumacious or dishonest or acted in conscious disregard of its obligations. Penalty will also not be imposed merely because it is lawful to do so.

Extinguishment of right in property for consideration is transfer

February 21, 2005 4752 Views 0 comment Print

Explore the legal implications of extinguishment of property rights in the CIT vs. Smt. Laxmidevi Ratani case at the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Uncover the details of the dispute, the compromise, and the tax implications. Understand the court’s ruling on whether the amount of Rs. 7,34,000 is considered a capital receipt subject to capital gains tax, as per Section 2(47) of the IT Act. Stay informed on the legal precedents cited, including the Bombay High Court decisions and the Supreme Court’s stance on property rights extinguishment.

Transfer of Shares | Case Analysis | Dove Investments v. Gujarat Industrial Investment Corp.

December 30, 2004 7161 Views 0 comment Print

Whether the obligation to register a transfer of shares within a particular period of time was mandatory or directory? Whether the company can cancel or reject the transfer where stamps on transfer form were not defaced or canceled?

Molasses storage fund collected out of sale proceeds of molasses as per law cannot be included in Income of Assessee

October 1, 2004 2559 Views 0 comment Print

Amounts were collected as per the directions given by the Molasses Control (Amendment) Order, it goes to the molasses storage fund over which the assessed has no control and domain. Inasmuch as the assessed cannot utilise the same for its own business purpose, we have also here to hold that there is diversion by overriding title at the source itself

Advance Tax Estimate furnished by assessee u/s. 210(5) cannot be rejected by department

March 16, 2004 6501 Views 0 comment Print

As per the provisions of section 210(5), if an assessee, who receives an order under sub-section (3) or (4) of section 210, feels that his current income would be less than the amount on which advance tax has been demanded, vide such order, he can send an intimation in Form No. 28A to the Assessing Officer and pay advance tax as per his own estimate.

A provision once declared unconstitutional could not be brought to life by mere administrative instructions

July 30, 2003 2292 Views 0 comment Print

In spite of the enunciation of law in ACC, Entry 25 has not stood revived or restored into the Sixth Schedule of the Act. Therefore the Authorities under the Act cannot levy tax under the Act in regard to transfer of property in goods involved in processing photo negatives and supplying of photo prints and photographs, as if Entry 25 has stood restored in the Sixth Schedule to the Act.

Income of co-operative bank from investment in PSEB bonds is deductible under section 80P

January 6, 2003 645 Views 0 comment Print

The only dispute in the present appeals is as to whether the assessee is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)( i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the income from the investment of rupees two crores in the purchase of 13.5 per cent. PSEB Bonds, 2003 First Series on September 20, 1993.

TDS not deductible on judgment debt

March 22, 2002 16656 Views 0 comment Print

Argument of the learned counsel on behalf of the Food Corporation of India that since the amount of Rs. 10,31,344 has admittedly been paid on account of interest, it retains its character as interest and, therefore, the Food Corporation of India must be allowed to deduct interest thereon at the rate in force, is not tenable

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31