Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
A small software company faced a maximum penalty of ₹2 lakh for delayed filing of financial statements. The ruling demonstrates MCA’s strict enforcement and timelines for filing under the Companies Act.
ROC Kanpur issues Order PO/ADJ/10-2025/KN/00752, imposing an ₹83,400 penalty on Haiderpur Fertilizer Producer Co. and its 5 directors for late filing of FY2024 Financial Statements.
Haiderpur Fertilizer Producer Company Ltd. and its directors were penalized for failing to file Financial Statements for FY 2022-23. ROC Kanpur imposed fines under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, highlighting directors’ personal liability.
ROC Kanpur’s order dated 10/10/2025 imposes a ₹175,450 penalty on Haiderpur Fertilizer Producer Company and its five directors for failing to file the Financial Statements (AOC-4).
Registrar of Companies penalized both the company and its officers for non-compliance with Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013. No response or hearing request was received, leading to automatic imposition of fines.
ROC Kanpur penalizes Haiderpur Fertilizer Producer Co. and five directors ₹4.32 Lakhs under Section 92(5) for failing to file the Annual Return for FY 2022-23.
A fertilizer company and its officers were penalized for failing to file annual returns for FY 2021-22, reinforcing that both corporate and personal liability applies under the Companies Act.
Penalties were imposed for continued non-compliance in filing annual returns, underscoring directors’ accountability and the personal financial consequences of default.
ROC Kanpur levied penalties on CSC Barikhas and its officers for non-submission of Annual Returns in Form MGT-7. The order reinforces timely filing obligations under Section 92 of the Companies Act.
ROC Kanpur levied a ₹7,36,500 penalty on CSC BARIKHAS FPC Ltd. and its five directors for failing to file the mandated Annual Return (MGT-7) for the 2022 fiscal year.
