Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
The company and directors were penalized under Sections 42(8), 450 & 454 of the Companies Act for incomplete securities allotment records, highlighting personal liability and the need for timely statutory filings.
ROC Goa levied maximum penalties totaling ₹4,00,000 on Indu Packaging (Daman) Limited and its three directors for repeatedly failing to print the CIN on company documents.
ROC Goa imposed an ₹8 lakh penalty on INDU PACKAGING (DAMAN) LIMITED and its directors for violating Section 197 by paying excess managerial remuneration in FY 2018-19.
ROC Goa imposed penalties on a company and its directors for failing to file Financial Statements for FY 2023-24. The ruling reinforces directors’ personal liability under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the importance of timely compliance.
ROC Goa imposed penalties on a company and its directors for failing to file Annual Returns for FY 2022-23. The ruling highlights the statutory obligation under Section 92(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 and financial consequences for non-compliance.
ROC Kanpur penalized All Time Activation Software and its two directors ₹4,00,000/- for violating Section 134 by failing to file the Director’s Report for FY 2020.
ROC Kanpur issued an adjudication order imposing a ₹3,50,000 penalty on EAST ALPHA ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD. and its directors for violating Section 92(1)(f) and 450.
ROC Cuttack imposes a 2,00,000 penalty on DP Financial Corporation of India Limited and its director for failing to maintain a registered office under the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Cuttack imposed penalties under Section 117(2) for failure to file a board resolution approving loans from a promoter. The order reiterates that all borrowing resolutions must be promptly filed with the Registrar.
ROC Kanpur levied a Rs 3,50,000 penalty on EAST ALPHA ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED and its directors for violating Section 92(1)(g) by misreporting director remuneration in the MGT-7 annual return.
