Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Learn about the penalty imposed by the MCA on a CFO for violating company law by holding office in more than one company. Detailed analysis and implications provided.
Penalty imposed by MCA on B&M PROPMART PRIVATE LIMITED for violating Section 10A of Companies Act, 2013 i.e. for Failure to File Declaration of Commencement of Business
Government of India takes action against Ramudraurban Bachat Nidhi Limited for violating Section 92 of Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis and implications in this article.
Learn about the penalties imposed on RAMUDRAURBAN BACHAT MUTUAL BENEFIT NIDHI LIMITED for violating the Companies Act, 2013. Understand the violations, fines, and the appeal process
Learn about penalty imposed by MCA for failing to mention Director Identification Numbers (DIN) against directors’ names in financial statements. Detailed analysis and implications of case.
Menzies Aviation Bobba (Bangalore) Private Limited failed to appoint a whole-time company secretary (CS) within the prescribed time frame, resulting in a violation of Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013 for a period of 730 days. The managing director, Mr. Bobba Veerasamynathan, has been held liable for the violation. The order imposes a penalty […]
The company, registered under the jurisdiction of RoC Karnataka, failed to dematerialize securities before transferring them, in violation of Rule 9A(3)(a) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014. The penalties of Rs. 10,000 each have been imposed on the company and its directors, Anil Prem Dsouza and Hansa Sharma.
As per Rule 23A of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, the declaration under section 10A by a director shall be in Form No. INC-20A and shall be filed as provided in the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 and the contents of the said form shall be verified by a company secretary or a […]
Resonance Eduventures Limited, its MD & CEO, and CS face a penalty of 7 Lakhs imposed by Ministry of Corporate Affairs for not constituting Nomination and Remuneration Committee as required by Companies Act, 2013.”
Resonance Eduventures Ltd faces a 7 lakh penalty from MCA for not constituting an audit committee, violating Section 177 of Companies Act 2013. Details here.
