Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Explore the penalty order under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 against Subway Finance & Investment Co Ltd for violation of Section 92. Details on the adjudication process, findings, and consequences.
A company cannot issue OCDs (Optionally Convertible Debentures) or CCDs (Compulsorily Convertible Debentures) through a rights issue under Section 62(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Read the detailed penalty order issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs for the violation of Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013 by Victor Impex Limited.
NAVCOM Industries faces penalties from MCA for not maintaining its registered office Explore the adjudication order violations and imposed lakh penalty
Explore the adjudication order against NAVCOM Industries for not maintaining a register of members, resulting in a penalty of Rs. 4.5 lakh imposed by MCA.
Discover the consequences of filing Form DIR-12 late under Section 170(2) of the Companies Act 2013. MCA issues a penalty of Rs. 4.54 Lakh Get insights and analysis
Explore the adjudication order against KHED DEVELOPERS LIMITED by the Office of the Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra. Penalties imposed for violations under the Companies Act, 2013.
Explore the penalty order against Yuvraj International Limited for violating Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis, findings, and consequences.
Government of India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs imposes penalties on Yuvraj International Limited and its directors for breaching Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013
Discover the adjudication order against Subway Finance Ltd. for breaching Section 137 of the Companies Act 2013. Insights, penalties, and implications discussed.
