Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Learn about the MCAs penalty on PRISM ORGANIC GREENS LIMITED for violating Companies Act, 2013 Analysis of the case penalties imposed, and the appeal process outlined
Government of India, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, imposes a penalty of Rs. 2 lakh on PRISM ORGANIC GREENS LIMITED for violating Companies Act, 2013, by not maintaining a registered office.
Explore the adjudication order under Section 454 against SM Dyechem Ltd for non-compliance with Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis, findings, and consequences.
Explore the Ministry of Corporate Affairs penalty on Hemco Engineering for non-circulation of board meeting minutes Understand the violations and penalties imposed
Discover the consequences of Section 173 violation by Hemco Engineering MCA imposes penalties. Detailed analysis of the board meeting notice non-sending issue
Explore the adjudication order under Section 454 against Tulsi Extrusions Ltd for non-compliance with Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis, findings, and penalties.
ROC Karnataka issues an adjudication order imposing penalties on Mukka Proteins Limited for violating Section 177(2) of Companies Act, 2013.
Explore the adjudication order under Section 454 against Turbotech Engineering Ltd for non-compliance with Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis, findings, and penalties.
Government of India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs imposes penalties on Shayona Petrochem Limited and its directors for violating Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Explore the adjudication order by the Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra, Pune, imposing penalties on Sitaram Maharaj Sakhar Karkhana Limited under Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013.
