Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Registrar of Companies imposed penalties on the company and its directors, citing non-compliance with Section 203. However, upon review, the penalty was reduced by 85% due to mitigating circumstances, including diligent efforts to fill the position and the unforeseen challenges posed by the pandemic.
Vishnupriya Hotels and Resorts Private Limited failed to appoint a Company Secretary despite the stipulated requirements under Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013, since November 2, 2018. The Registrar of Companies, Andhra Pradesh, imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/- each on the company and its two directors, totaling Rs. 15,00,000/-.
Significant reduction in penalties for Aerostructures Assemblies India by MCA over compliance issues, highlighting efforts during COVID-19. Read more.
Discover the impact as MCA reduces penalties by 12.75 Lakh in the case of Vishnupriya Hotels and Resorts. Detailed analysis of the adjudication order and implications for companies.
Learn how MCA RD reduces penalty from 67.16 Lakh to 13.43 Lakh for unspent CSR fund transfer delays. Details of the case and grounds for penalty reduction.
Discover how IBM Global Financing India’s non-appointment of a Company Secretary led to a hefty penalty by MCA, which was later reduced from ₹29.94 lakh to ₹4.49 lakh after appeal.
In a significant decision, the MCA reduced the penalty for Shrushti Contech Pvt Ltd’s non-appointment of a Company Secretary from ₹25 lakh to ₹3.75 lakh. Discover the details.
Explore the appeal filed by Stanley Lifestyles Limited against penalties imposed under the Companies Act, 2013, and the subsequent reduction in penalties by the Registrar of Companies, Karnataka.
Explore the appeal filed by Shrushti Contech Private Limited against penalties under the Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis of the adjudication order and its implications.
Read about the reduction of penalty from Rs. 29.94 lakh to 15% by MCA due to non-appointment of CS by IBM Global Financing India Pvt. Ltd. Detailed analysis provided.
