Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dream Spa Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Excise CGST (CESTAT Allahabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dream Spa Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Allahabad) CESTAT Allahabad held that service tax demand is confirmed since it is will established that assessee was collecting the service tax from its customers/ clients, however, the same was not deposited to the government exchequer. Accordingly, appeal of assessee dismissed. Facts- Appellant is holding service tax registration for providing services of “Health Club & Fitness Centre Service and Beauty Parlour / Beauty Treatment services covered as taxable service under clause (51) read with clause (44) of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930