Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : IIITB Innovation Centre Vs CIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2025-26
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
IIITB Innovation Centre Vs CIT (ITAT Bangalore) Wrong Code in Form 10AB Cannot Defeat U/s 80G Registration: ITAT Restores Application .The Bangalore ITAT held that an application for approval under section 80G cannot be rejected merely because the applicant selected an incorrect code in Form 10AB, without first being given an opportunity to rectify the mistake. The Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(Exemptions) for fresh consideration. In this case, IIITB Innovation Centre had applied for 80G recognition through Form 10AB. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application on the ground that t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031