Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs R. N. Gems (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs R. N. Gems (ITAT Mumbai) “Without purchases there cannot be sales” – Mumbai ITAT rejects 100% bogus purchase addition in diamond trade case In a significant ruling, the Mumbai ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld restriction of addition on alleged bogus purchases to only the profit element embedded therein, holding that once sales are accepted, the entire purchases cannot be disallowed. The reassessment was triggered based on information received from the Investigation Wing alleging that the assessee had obtained accommodation entries from concerns linked to the R...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930