Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Jaspalsingh Prehaladsingh Chandok (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Jaspalsingh Prehaladsingh Chandok (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that gain arising on transfer of assets and liabilities of proprietary concern to succeeding company is covered by provisions of section 47(xiv) and accordingly cannot be considered as transfer of capital asset within meaning of section 45. Thus, appeal of revenue dismissed. Facts- The Revenue has filed this appeal. The Revenue is aggrieved by the decision of CIT(A) in deleting the addition of LongTerm Capital Gains of Rs. 325 crores assessed by the AO. Notably, the issue urged before us revolves around interpretation of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930