This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
TPO cannot question need or prudence for making payment of the expenditure
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Royal Canin India Private Limited Vs Additional/Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Royal Canin India Private Limited Vs Additional/Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that TPO has jurisdiction to examine the quantum of expenditure, however, TPO has no jurisdiction question the assessee’s need or prudence for making payment for the expenditure.
Facts-
The assessee entered into Franchise Agreement with Royal Canin SAS, France (subsidiary). During the period relevant to AY under appeal, the assessee entered into various international transactions with its Associated Enterprise (AE) Royal Canin SAS. One of the inte...






