Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Navunda Abdulla Badruddin Vs PCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 508/Bang/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/09/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Navunda Abdulla Badruddin Vs PCIT (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore held that PCIT justified in invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act as AO merely accepted the additional income offered by the assessee without verifying the bogus purchases and amount recorded in books.

Facts-

PCIT during the review of assessment records noticed that AO has taxed the unexplained expenses on regular rates. PCIT stated that the unexplained expenses are not recorded in the books of account and therefore it should not have been brought to tax u/s. 69C of the Act and should be taxed u/s. 115BBE of the Act. To this extent the PCIT considered the order of the AO to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue and in this regard issued show cause notice to the assessee u/s.263.

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031