Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shaik Abdul Khader Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shaik Abdul Khader Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Penalty Initiated in December, Order Passed in December Next Year – ITAT Hyderabad Quashes 270A Penalty as Time-Barred u/s 275(1)(c) Assessee, challenged the validity of a penalty order passed u/s 270A on the ground of limitation prescribed under section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The assessment order u/s 143(3) was passed on 04.12.2020, wherein  AO clearly recorded at para 7 that he was “satisfied that Assessee underreported his income” &  therefore “penalty u/s 270A is initiated.” Further, the penalty notice u/s 274 r.w.s. 270A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031