This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Time-Barred Penalty: ITAT Hyderabad Quashes 270A Order Passed Six Months Beyond Section 275(1)(c) Deadline
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shaik Abdul Khader Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Shaik Abdul Khader Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Penalty Initiated in December, Order Passed in December Next Year – ITAT Hyderabad Quashes 270A Penalty as Time-Barred u/s 275(1)(c)
Assessee, challenged the validity of a penalty order passed u/s 270A on the ground of limitation prescribed under section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The assessment order u/s 143(3) was passed on 04.12.2020, wherein AO clearly recorded at para 7 that he was “satisfied that Assessee underreported his income” & therefore “penalty u/s 270A is initiated.” Further, the penalty notice u/...







