Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Umesh Kumar Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Ranchi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Umesh Kumar Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Ranchi) Assessee filed appeal against the order of the CIT(A)/NFAC dated 23.10.2024 for AY 2017-18. Assessee had failed to produce necessary documents before both AO & CIT(A). As a result, e CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte without adjudicating the issues on merits. Before Tribunal, Assessee submitted that he could not furnish documents earlier due to unavoidable reasons, and requested one more opportunity to present relevant evidence before AO. It was pleaded that the matter may be restored to AO for fresh consideration. Department strongly opposed the p...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Excess Stock in Survey = Business Income, Not 115BBE Hit – ITAT Pune Draws Clear Line No Specific Charge = No Penalty – ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty for Vague Notice Bonafide Claim Updated Return Can’t Kill Genuine Exemption – ITAT Allows Section 11 Relief Despite Delay Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031