Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kedar Ramakant Kulkarni Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kedar Ramakant Kulkarni Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Survey in Builder’s Case Not Enough: Onus on AO, Not on Assessee: ITAT Pune Rejects Unexplained Investment Theory-Third-Party Survey Material Without Proof Can’t Sustain s.69 Addition The Pune Bench (SMC) of the ITAT, vide order dated 31.12.2025 in Kedar Ramakant Kulkarni v. ACIT, Circle-8, Pune (ITA No. 2614/PUN/2025, AY 2020-21), allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted the addition of ₹17,50,000 made u/s 69 on account of alleged unexplained cash investment in purchase of office premises. The assessee had purchased office premises from M/s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031