Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kiran Kubendra Kalal Vs Income Tax Department Rep. (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kiran Kubendra Kalal Vs Income Tax Department Rep. (Karnataka High Court) Allegation: In AY 2008-09, petitioner’s return showed tax of ₹17,090. However, challan submitted showed only ₹1,090 paid, with an extra digit “7” inserted in the challan to make it appear ₹17,090 was deposited. Complaint: Filed under Sections 276C(2) & 277, IT Act (wilful tax evasion & false verification). Petitioner’s Stand Paid full ₹17,090 to his Chartered Accountant (CA). Fraud was committed by CA & staff (accused nos. 2–4), who deposited only ₹1,090 and altered the challan. S...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930