This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Tax Demand Invalid When Arising from Typographical Error Without Malafide Intent
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Kopran Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2022-23
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Kopran Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that demand is invalid since raised on account of typographical error with no malafide intention as assessee shouldn’t be burdened with unnecessary hardship in case there is any inadvertent error which are not malafide.
Facts-
The present appeal has been preferred by the revenue. The revenue is in appeal challenging the deletion on addition made on account of increase in profit or decrease in loss of ICDS adjustment and deviation in method of valuation of stock amounting to Rs. 34,56,43,410/- and decrease in profit or increase in loss of ICD...






