Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s Cosmo Films Limited (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA 1404/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CIT vs. Cosmo Films Ltd (Delhi High Court) –   High Court observed that if the sale and lease back agreement between the assessee and the OSEB indicate that the assessee had purchased the plant and machinery from OSEB for a price and had leased out the same to OSEB on lease rent, the revenue department cannot  discard the said sale and lease back agreement on the ground that the underlying motive of the assessee to enter into the said transaction was to reduce its income-tax liability. The Orissa High Court observed that the revenue could, however, discard the said transaction only if there were materials or evidence before it to show that the intentions of the parties were different from what had been incorporated in the sale and lease back agreements and that the transaction was really a sham and dubious transaction and was a colourable device.

We are in complete agreement with these observations of the Orissa High Court in the case of Industrial Development Corporation of Orissa Limited (supra). We are also in agreement with the conclusion of the said High Court that in such cases, the court would have to find out as to what was the real intention of the parties in entering into the sale and lease agreement and that such intention has to be gathered from the words in the said agreement in a tangible and in an objective manner and not upon a hypothetical assessment of the supposed motive of the assessee to avoid tax. We have already indicated that the intention gathered from the documents on record shows that the ownership and title of the said equipment had been transferred to the respondent / assessee and that after the said transfer, the lease was entered into and the said equipment was leased back to the HSEB. It has not at all been established on the basis of evidence on  record that the transaction was a colourable device entered into by and between the HSEB and the respondent / assessee.

 

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Judgment delivered on: 18.07.2011

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031