Case Law Details
Case Name : Pr. CIT Vs M/s. E Smart Systems Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pr. CIT Vs M/s. E Smart Systems Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
It is relevant to state that AO in his remand report dated 10.10.2016 did not dispute the veracity of the additional evidences furnished by the assessee and further learned CIT(A) did not admit the additional evidences purely on technical ground which is wholly unwarranted in law. In fact, additional evidences were computerized documents and have evidentiary value. It is submitted that it is settled law that when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, cause of substantial justice deserves to b...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
“Substantial justice” – a brand new concept (?) by way of UPDATING the overall thinking, so far being pursued and adopted by the REVENUE; whch only leads to procrastination of the entire process with undue emphasis on ‘technicalities’ /hyper…..; mIndless of the cost to the Exchequer , and from all angles- at the cost of the -easy target – ‘taxpayers’ monies ?!
Does this not have an inteded or untended countervailing effect on the ongoing tall talk about the need for ‘reforms’ through- ‘SIMPLIFICATION’ ?!