Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Wellworth Construction Udyog Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA--443/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/02/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief Facts of the Case and Question of LawBrief Facts

During AY 2003-04, the assessee had received Rs. 1.65 crores as share application money from three concerns. These three amounts were returned by the assessee in the succeeding financial year 2004-05. It is a matter of record that the amounts were retained by the assessee for about 3-4 months. The AO disallowed the entire amount of Rs. 1.65 crores on the basis of his decision that the three entities, i.e. the share applicants did not have adequate resources.

Question of Law

Whether share application money be treated as unexplained credit under section 68 on the grounds that share applicants did not had adequate means or resources?

 Contention of the Assessee

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031