Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tejsingh Dhansingh Rajpurohit Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tejsingh Dhansingh Rajpurohit Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 invokable only if books are maintained by Assessee; No books maintained u/s 44AD? Section 68 addition not sustainable: rules ITAT Mumbai The key issue before the Tribunal was the addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash and cheque deposits in the bank. Assessee, a trader in plastic items filed return under presumptive taxation u/s 44AD. Assessee made total deposits in banks by cash or otherwise at Rs 54,05,402 whereas the gross sales/receipts were disclosed at Rs 27,14,204 only. AO added the difference of ₹26.91 lakh as unexplained. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case CA Not Liable for Client’s Bogus Entries: ICAI Clears Accountant with No Certification Role Suspicion ≠ Proof: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Multi-Bank Loan Fraud Case Delayed Retraction Backfires: ICAI Finds CA Guilty in Bogus Donation Tax Evasion Scheme Admission Seals Fate: ICAI Reprimands CA in Bogus Political Donation Scam View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930