Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vikas Ratanlal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vikas Ratanlal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Stock-in-Trade Exemption: ITAT Remands Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition for Fresh Verification; Stamp Duty Value Dispute Remanded: ITAT Orders Review of F.Y. for Property Purchase Assessment; Incorrect Asset Classification: ITAT Directs Reassessment on Applicability of Section 56(2)(vii)(b); Cost of Acquisition Issue: ITAT Remands Valuation Case to Consider Nazarana and Advance Payments Assessee purchased two plots for consideration lower than stamp duty value, leading AO to make addition of ₹21,00,475/- u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) as “income from other source...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031