Case Law Details
Srinivas Bejgam Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
In the original return of income, the assessee has not offered the capital gain to tax nor has he claimed deduction u/s 54F of the Act. In view of the same, the assessment order, disallowing the claim of deduction u/s 54F is justified. However, the assessee had filed written submissions before the CIT(A) and had submitted before the Tribunal that he had all the relevant evidence to substantiate the claim u/s 54F of the Act. Since S.54F of the Act is a beneficial provision and the Hon’ble Courts have held that the beneficial provision should be construed liberally, I deem it fit and proper to admit assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 54F of the Act and remand the issue to the file of the AO with a direction to consider the eligibility of the assessee for deduction u/s 54F of the Act and allow the same if the assessee satisfies the conditions. Needless to mention that the assessee shall be given a fair opportunity of hearing.
FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT
This is assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11 against the order of Ld.CIT(A)-8, Hyderabad dated 15.02.2019.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee, an individual, running a provisional store by name M/s Sri Parameshwara Kirana & General Stores had derived income from business and capital gains. During the Previous Year 2009-10, the assessee along with another person sold a house property bearing H.No.2-2-94 and 2-2-95, consisting of ground floor and first floor, on a total admeasuring and comprising area of 115 sq. yards situated at Ameerpet, Hyderabad for a consideration of Rs.20,00,000/- vide registered sale deed with document no. 1557/2009, dated 24.06.2009. The AO observed that the Market Value of the property as per the sale deed as determined by SRO for the purpose of payment of stamp duty was Rs.41,85,800/-. Therefore, he was of the opinion that provisions of S.50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) were applicable in assessee’s case. Since the assessee has filed return of income for A.Y. 2010-11 admitting total income from business amounting to Rs.1,53,500/- after Chapter-VIA deduction, but the assessee had not offered the said capital gain to tax, the AO re-opened the assessment u/s 147 of the Act by issuance of a notice u/s 148 of the Act. In response to the notice u/s 148 of the Act, the assessee submitted a letter stating that on account of sale of house property, his share was only Rs.10,00,000/- and the remaining share was with his brother, and out of sale consideration received, he has constructed first floor on the existing ground floor at house bearing H.No.8-43/8/S/3, Balaji Hills, Boduppal, Hyderabad, for which the assessee had claimed exemption from payment of tax on long term capital gain as he was holding only one house property apart from the one house he has sold. Since the assessee failed to disclose capital gain on the original return of income and as there was no claim of deduction u/s 54F of the Act in the original return, and the assessee failed to file the revised return of income, the AO held that the claim of exemption u/s 54F is not acceptable. The AO, accordingly, brought the long term capital gain of Rs.15,47,244/- to tax.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
