No section 40A(2) disallowance for Payment Made to Sister-In-Law

Rajesh Bajaj Vs DCIT (ITAT Allahabad)

The ld. counsel for the assessee has contended that Alka Bajaj and Preeti Bajaj are sister-in-law of the assessee and therefore do not fall in the definition of relative as provided u/s 2(41). This fact is not disputed by the Revenue and therefore, the payment to these two persons would not fall in the ambit of provisions of section 40A(2) when the transaction is not with the relative of the assessee as provided u/s 40A(2)(b)(i) of the Act. There is no dispute that the definition of the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.