ITAT Allahabad held that on account of inadvertent error in reporting by the tax auditor in form 3 CD this addition has been made while framing the assessment order u/s 143(1) by CPC, Bangalore, which is system oriented. Thus, matter remanded back to the file of AO.
Neeraj Gas Movers successfully argues for the validity of a rectified partnership deed, leading to the approval of salary and interest claims by ITAT.
ITAT Allahabad held that additions made based on the incriminating material (being excess stock) found during survey conducted u/s 133A of the Income Tax Act is justifiable.
Society for Welfare and Advancement of Rural Generation (SWARG) Vs DCIT (ITAT Allahabad) Assessee was required to pay the appeal fee of Rs. 10,000/- as per section 253(6)(c) of the Income Tax Act but despite repeated defect notices issued to the assessee as per the directions of this Bench, neither the assessee has made up […]
ITAT Allahabad held that passing an ex-parte appellate order without providing any opportunity even in case of faceless assessment proceedings unjustified as adherence to Principles of natural justice is one of the most important pillar of the effective judicial delivery system.
ITAT Allahabad held that allowable limit as CBDT circular dated 11th May 1994 is the gold jewellery and ornaments to the extent of 500 grams per married lady, 250 grams per unmarried lady and 100 grams per male member of the family. Accordingly, no addition to that extent on account of unexplained investment in jewellery can be sustained.
ITAT Allahabad held that the interests on the credit balance in the capital account of the partners of the firms has to be calculated on the actual duration of the credit remains in the capital account and not on opening or closing day of financial year.
ITAT Allahabad held that facts brought to the notice of this Tribunal are relevant and very crucial for deciding the issue under consideration. Since the facts were not produced before earlier authorities impugned order is recalled
Pramod Kumar Tiwari Vs DCIT (ITAT Allahabad) in the case in hand, the assessee has admittedly filed the return under wrong provisions of presumptive tax under section 44ADA whereas the commission income as reflected in Form 26AS is subjected to TDS under section 194H and is required to be declared in Form ITR 3 as […]
Hanuman Prasad & Sons Vs DCIT/ACIT/ITO (ITAT Allahabad) In this case assessee has not only replied the notice but also replied to the letter issued by AO. After considering the reply of the assessee, the Assessing Officer framed the assessment under section 143(3) on 28th December, 2019. Once the assessee has made the compliance though […]
