This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 271E penalty cannot be imposed for Payment for purchases
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- B. P. Patel and Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
B. P. Patel and Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
It is elementary to say that the ‘satisfaction’ can only be formed by the person who is competent to impose penalty and not a lower ranking authority. The law provides for imposition of penalty by an officer of the rank of the Joint Commissioner. Thus, the AO is statutorily debarred for forming any ‘satisfaction’ either at the time of assessment order or subsequent thereto.
Ld. AR mentioned that although the outstanding liability was shown under the ‘head loans’ in the balance sheet, such declaration by itself cannot be taken as sacrosanc...




