Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amit Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amit Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) ITAT Chandigarh: Cash Loans Between Agriculturists with No Taxable Income—Penalties u/s 271D ; 271E Quashed The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee’s appeals for AY 2010-11 and cancelled penalties levied under sections 271D and 271E for acceptance and repayment of loans in cash. The Tribunal noted that although the assessee had accepted and repaid loans in cash from relatives and family friends, both the assessee and the lenders were agriculturists, and neither had income chargeable to tax under the Act. The assessee’s agricultural inco...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031