Case Law Details
Swati Jignesh Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Introduction: Dive into the intricacies of the case involving Swati Jignesh Jain and the Income Tax Officer (ITO) as the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai deliberates on the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The core issue revolves around the AO’s deemed condonation of the assessee’s absence during the assessment proceedings, ultimately influencing the tribunal’s decision. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the proceedings and the tribunal’s verdict.
Detailed Analysis: The article delves into the background of the case, highlighting that Swati Jignesh Jain, an individual, initially faced a reopened assessment for the assessment year 2014-15. The AO completed the reassessment under Section 143(3) of the Act on December 29, 2017. During the re-assessment proceedings, the assessee faced challenges in securing her presence and clarity arose due to her marital status. However, the AO, upon the subsequent appearance and submission of necessary details by the assessee, deemed the earlier absence as condoned.
The detailed analysis includes references to relevant legal precedents such as Ganesh B Pokhriyal vs ACIT, Globus Infocom Ltd., vs. DCIT, Akhil Bharatiya Prathmik Shamshak Sangh Bhawan Trust vs. ADIT, and Pillala Vishnuvandana vs. ACIT. These cases establish the precedent that when assessments are completed under Section 143(3), the AO is deemed to have condoned the assessee’s earlier absence or that of the authorized representative.
Conclusion: Based on the legal precedents and the understanding that the AO’s completion of assessment under Section 143(3) implies condonation of the assessee’s earlier absence, the ITAT Mumbai decided that this is not a suitable case for imposing a penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Act. The tribunal directed the AO to delete the penalty. This conclusion underscores the importance of recognizing the AO’s actions in the assessment process and their impact on subsequent penalty considerations.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
