Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Synergy Art Foundation Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Synergy Art Foundation Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Deleted Where Loss Claim Withdrawn and No Tax Benefit Availed The Mumbai ITAT (G Bench) allowed the appeal of Synergy Art Foundation Ltd. for AY 2012-13 and deleted the penalty of ₹8.44 lakh levied under section 271(1)(c), holding that the case did not warrant imposition of concealment penalty. The Tribunal held that: The assessee had originally claimed a capital loss of ₹26.06 lakh, which was subsequently withdrawn during assessment proceedings when called upon to justify the claim. The returned income for the year w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031