Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aslam Checkar Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Aslam Checkar Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) Section 205 Absolutely Bars Tax Recovery from Employees Where TDS Is Deducted but Not Deposited by Employer-Bombay High Court: The Bombay High Court, in Aslam Checkar v. Income Tax Officer & Ors., allowed a batch of writ petitions filed by employees whose employer had deducted TDS from salaries but failed to deposit the same with the Government. The petitioners were subjected to income-tax demands solely on account of such non-deposit by the employer. Interpreting Section 205 of the Income-tax Act, the Court held that the statutory bar against recov...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031