Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Arun Kumar (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Arun Kumar (ITAT Delhi) Sale of Shares Through SEBI Broker, Tax Paid—No Scope for s.68 Addition – Notice u/s 148 Violates Asian Paints Rule- Revenue’s Appeal Dismissed Revenue appealed against deletion of addition of Rs.57,06,000/- made by AO u/s 68 on alleged penny stock transactions in shares of City Travel Solutions Ltd. Assessee had purchased 19,000 shares in April 2013 for Rs.11,86,972/- & sold them in March 2014 through Reliance Securities Ltd, a SEBI-registered broker, receiving net sale proceeds of Rs.56,94,882/-. Assessee had already declared Rs.45,08,090/- as S...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031