Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Kolahai Infotech Private Limited (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Kolahai Infotech Private Limited (ITAT Delhi) PCIT Approval Not Enough After 3 Years—Tribunal Applies Rajeev Bansal- Jurisdictional Defect Fatal: Wrong Approval Under s.151(ii) Invalidates Entire 147 Proceedings Revenue appealed against order of CIT(A), while Assessee filed cross objections challenging reopening u/s 147 on the ground that notice u/s 148 was issued without obtaining mandatory sanction from the specified authority prescribed u/s 151 of the new regime. For AY 2016-17, notice u/s 148 was issued on 27.07.2022—more than 3 years from end of relevant AY. Under s.151(ii), ap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031