Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Rajan Kumar (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Rajan Kumar (ITAT Delhi) Reassessment Notice Time-Barred Despite Ashish Agarwal Relief – ITAT Delhi Applies Rajeev Bansal Ratio The Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2013-14 and upheld the quashing of reassessment proceedings on the ground of limitation under section 149, even in cases covered by the Supreme Court’s decision in Ashish Agarwal. In this case, the original notice under section 148 (old regime) was issued on 17.06.2021. Pursuant to Ashish Agarwal, the notice was deemed to be a show-cause notice under section 148A(b), and the assessee submitted i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031