Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Electronfab Engineering Pvt Ltd. Vs CPT/ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2024-25
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Electronfab Engineering Pvt Ltd. Vs CPT/ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 115BAA Benefit Cannot Be Denied for Procedural Lapse – Form 10IC Filed Later Valid, Matter Restored The assessee company filed its original return without opting for concessional tax regime u/s 115BAA, but later: Filed Form 10IC before filing corrected return u/s 139(9) Rectified defective return and expressed clear intent to opt for 115BAA However, CPC denied the benefit during processing u/s 143(1) and raised demand. CIT(A) upheld the denial. Before ITAT, key points were: Form 10IC was on record before processing Delay wa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031