Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Moldtek Packaging Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Moldtek Packaging Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Conclusion: AO was justified in treating the payment to ROC for increase in capital as capital expenditure as ROC expenses was fees for enhancement of capital. Held: In the instant case, assessee had claimed ROC expenses in the profit and loss account u/s. 35D of Rs.58,500. However, AO disallowed the same. It was held that the issue had rightly been decided by CIT(A) on relying on the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Brookbond India Limited Vs. CIT and Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation Vs. CIT 225 ITR 792 (SC) wher...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930