Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nitin Naryan Keskar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nitin Naryan Keskar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Unexplained Capital Spike Stands: ITAT Pune Upholds ₹1.70 Cr Addition u/s 68 Capital Can’t Grow in a Vacuum: ₹1.70 Cr Addition Sustained-  No Returns, No Proof, No Relief: ITAT Backs 68 Addition- Afterthought Ledgers Don’t Save Unexplained Capital In Nitin Narayan Keskar vs. ITO  (ITA No.1000/PUN/2025, AY 2014-15; order dated 29-12-2025), the Pune Bench “A” of the ITAT dismissed the Assessee’s appeal and confirmed addition of ₹1,70,64,449 u/s 68 on account of unexplained increase in proprietor’s capital. The Assessee, a contractor with...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031