Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Proform Interiors Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Proform Interiors Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi upheld CIT(A) and dismissed Revenue’s appeal for AY 2012-13, holding reopening time-barred despite search in Feb-2022. Applying the first proviso to s.149(1)(b) and the Supreme Court ruling in Rajeev Bansal, the Tribunal held that for AYs prior to 2021-22, limitation must be tested under the old regime. On that yardstick, AY 2012-13 was already dead; the extended 10-year window under the new law cannot revive a barred year. For the remaining years AYs 2013-14 to 2022-23, the Tribunal struck down assessments on an even stronger ground...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Charitable Trust Allowed to Set-off Earlier Years’ Excess Application Against Current Income; Form 9A Not Required SCN u/s 74 GST Valid Even if Based on Material from Alleged Illegal Search: Karnataka HC Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: Karnataka HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void: Karnataka HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031