Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Novotech Steel & Alloys Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Novotech Steel & Alloys Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) Reopening Cannot Be Quashed Using New Law Retrospectively – Matter Remanded to CIT(A) Mumbai ITAT held that the CIT(A) erred in quashing a reassessment notice by applying the amended provisions of Section 149 (Finance Act, 2021) retrospectively. The reassessment notice was issued on 18.03.2020 (pre-amendment regime). However, the CIT(A) quashed it by applying the post-01.04.2021 limitation of 3 years (where escaped income < ₹50 lakh). The Tribunal clarified that such amended provisions cannot be applied to notices iss...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930