Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Golden Play Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Golden Play Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT held that the CIT(A) cannot summarily dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution without adjudicating the issues on merits, especially legal grounds like validity of reopening u/s 148. The case involved an addition of ₹75 lakh u/s 68 for alleged accommodation entries. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte, merely concurring with the AO, without: Independently examining the facts, or Deciding the legal challenge to reopening, which goes to the root of jurisdiction The Tribunal emphasized: CIT(A) is a quasi-judicial authority with ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930