Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gaddeppa Santhosh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Gaddeppa Santhosh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore ) Bangalore ITAT deleted a penalty of ₹30,000 levied under Section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with notices. The assessee, a pujari and astrologer with largely cash-based income, had failed to respond to multiple notices during reassessment proceedings initiated due to substantial cash deposits. The Tribunal observed that the assessee was not a regular taxpayer, lacked awareness of income tax procedures, and became aware of proceedings only after receiving a substantial demand. It also noted that the quantum addition itself had been restored to the A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Restores Section 80P Deduction Claim of Agricultural Credit Co-op Society Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031