Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gaddeppa Santhosh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gaddeppa Santhosh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore ) Bangalore ITAT deleted a penalty of ₹30,000 levied under Section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with notices. The assessee, a pujari and astrologer with largely cash-based income, had failed to respond to multiple notices during reassessment proceedings initiated due to substantial cash deposits. The Tribunal observed that the assessee was not a regular taxpayer, lacked awareness of income tax procedures, and became aware of proceedings only after receiving a substantial demand. It also noted that the quantum addition itself had been restored to the A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Holds Guarantor Liable for Original Loan, Not Unauthorized Overdrawals Escaped Income Below ₹50 Lakh? Reopening After 3 Years Is Dead on Arrival: ITAT Quashes NRI Reassessment Software Licences Aren’t Capital Assets: ITAT Allows ₹37.87 Crore Deduction to BNP Paribas Search Surrender Doesn’t Mean Maximum Penalty: ITAT Cuts Section 271AAB Levy from 90% to 30% CBDT Delay Can’t Defeat Exemption Claim: ITAT Revives Section 10(46) Relief for Maharashtra Fee Regulator View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031