Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Sahara States (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1498-1501/HYD/2012, ITA No. 1498-1501/HYD/2012, 1848/HYD/2011 and 1886/HYD/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/06/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Facts of the Case

The joint venture agreement was made with an intention to carry on the project. Assessee-AOP took over the project, developed and claimed deduction u/s. 80IB(10). In the original assessment completed u/s. 143(3) for AYs. 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06, AOs examined the eligibility of the assessee and allowed the claim of deduction after due verification of all agreements, documents and also field verification by the Inspector in respective assessment years. Subsequently, while completing the assessment for AY. 2006-07, the AO insisted on furnishing ‘Project Completion Certificate’. Since assessee could not furnish the same, AO took the view that assessee was not eligible for deduction u/s. 80IB(10). Consequently, the assessments completed in earlier years were re-opened u/s. 147 mainly on the reason that assessee has failed to furnish the ‘Project Completion Certificate’.
Question of Law

Whether the re-opening of Assessment were justified u/s 147 only on the ground that there was a subsequent amendment in Law?

Contention of the Assessee

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031