Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Sama Srinivas Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1312 & 1313/HYD/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/06/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Facts of the case

These are the two appeals having the same issues in common. The Assessee is engaged in the business of running tent house and derives business profit, apart from income from property and agricultural income. During the assessment proceedings, AO observed that the amount of Rs.25,73,902 was deposited as cash on various dates in the bank account maintained with Andhra Bank and in the absence of any details and explanations for the sources of cash deposits, AO treated the entire cash deposits as unexplained income of the assessee and passed an ex-parte order u/s 144. Subsequently, a revised remand report was furnished indicating the contents/entries of one more bank account (Vijaya Bank, Sahebnagar Branch) which was not shown to the department. The AO had considered the deposits only in Andhra Bank account and not Vijaya Bank account. It was further pointed out that only before the CIT (A), assessee had mentioned about the Vijaya Bank account and had filed the details of the same.
Question of Law

Whether the Revenue was right in doing the Assessment without taking into consideration all the different bank accounts?

Contentions of the Assessee

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031