Case Law Details
Case Name : Rajkamal R. Bajaj v/s ADDL. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
CA Prarthana Jalan
Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT has in the case of Mr. Rajkamal R. Bajaj v/s ACIT has held that Reimbursement of a medical expense is not perquisite u/s 17(2) of the Act. Brief facts of the case are that The assessee received a sum of Rs.90,090/- towards reimbursement of medical expenses from the company M/s Bajaj Consultants Pvt. Ltd., wherein, he is a Director and claimed the same as exempt u/s 17(2) of the Act. The ld. Assessing Officer in view of se
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment
Subscribe to Our Daily Newsletter
Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
Is it applies for salaried employees. Because the specified case is applicable for director, is not an employee.. clarify
please tell me the treatment of Medical Allowance received by employee, whether it is exempt if yes then upto what extent, and whether employee required to furnished bill???