Case Law Details
Nirmala Venkatapathy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Introduction: The recent case of Nirmala Venkatapathy Vs ITO, adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Chennai, delves into the critical issue of referencing the District Valuation Officer (DVO) in tax assessments when the taxpayer’s declared asset value surpasses the Fair Market Value (FMV). This article provides an in-depth analysis of the case, the arguments presented, and the implications of the tribunal’s decision.
Detailed Analysis: The crux of the matter revolved around the computation of capital gains concerning the sale of a property by the assessee, wherein discrepancies arose regarding the valuation of the property as on April 1, 1981. The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, questioning the inflation of the property’s cost of acquisition by the taxpayer. The AO referred the matter to the DVO for valuation, disputing the taxpayer’s declared value.
The ITAT Chennai, after thorough examination, emphasized the legal framework under Section 55A(a) of the Act, which permits referencing the DVO only if the taxpayer’s declared value falls below the FMV. The tribunal reiterated the principle established in previous judgments, including the decision by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in CIT vs. Puja Prints, wherein it was held that no reference to the DVO can be made if the taxpayer’s declared value exceeds the FMV.
Furthermore, the tribunal scrutinized the amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2012, in Section 55A(a) of the Act, clarifying that the amended provision does not have retrospective effect and reaffirming the applicability of the original provision in the present case.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
