Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Javeed Khan Ahemad Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Javeed Khan Ahemad Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

₹3.32 Cr 69A Addition Not Decided on Merits— Legal Grounds Not Examined- Matter Restored for Fresh Hearing

Assessee did not file ROI for AY 2017-18. Based on cash deposits of ₹3,10,81,973 & other deposits of ₹21,79,000, AO issued notices u/s 148A(d) & 148. Assessee did not respond to 148A proceedings or to 142(1). AO completed best-judgment assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B, adding ₹3,32,60,973 u/s 69A as unexplained money.

Before CIT(A)/NFAC, assessee partly complied & challenge

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats Between Third Parties Not Evidence Against Company Without Corroboration Overtime Wages Must Include Allowances Under Factories Act: SC Commission Addition Deleted for Lack of Proof of Accommodation Entries: ITAT Delhi Double Taxation Bar Invoked to Delete Interest TP Adjustment: ITAT Delhi Once Section 263 Order Is Quashed, Fresh Assessment Cannot Survive: ITAT Delhi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031