Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Javeed Khan Ahemad Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Javeed Khan Ahemad Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ₹3.32 Cr 69A Addition Not Decided on Merits— Legal Grounds Not Examined- Matter Restored for Fresh Hearing Assessee did not file ROI for AY 2017-18. Based on cash deposits of ₹3,10,81,973 & other deposits of ₹21,79,000, AO issued notices u/s 148A(d) & 148. Assessee did not respond to 148A proceedings or to 142(1). AO completed best-judgment assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B, adding ₹3,32,60,973 u/s 69A as unexplained money. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, assessee partly complied & challenged both jurisdiction of reopening & addi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930