Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Javeed Khan Ahemad Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Javeed Khan Ahemad Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ₹3.32 Cr 69A Addition Not Decided on Merits— Legal Grounds Not Examined- Matter Restored for Fresh Hearing Assessee did not file ROI for AY 2017-18. Based on cash deposits of ₹3,10,81,973 & other deposits of ₹21,79,000, AO issued notices u/s 148A(d) & 148. Assessee did not respond to 148A proceedings or to 142(1). AO completed best-judgment assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B, adding ₹3,32,60,973 u/s 69A as unexplained money. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, assessee partly complied & challenged both jurisdiction of reopening & addi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031