Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Meghana Enterprises (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
ITO Vs Meghana Enterprises (ITAT Hyderabad) Faceless vs JAO: Reassessment Notice Issued by JAO Held Invalid – Revenue Appeal Dismissed with Liberty to Revive In this appeal by Revenue, the core issue before Tribunal was whether a notice u/s 148 & order u/s 148A(d) issued by the Jurisdictional AO (JAO) — instead of the Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) — is valid after the introduction of mandatory faceless reassessment regime w.e.f. 01.04.2021. Assessee was a non-filer, and information indicated contractor payments of ₹1.21 crore. JAO issued notice u/s 148 on 31.03.2022 & compl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031