Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Reassessment Quashed as Section 153C, Not Section 147, Applied: ITAT Ahmedabad

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 8824
Case Name
Ghanshyam Madhusudan Soni Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2009-10
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Ghanshyam Madhusudan Soni Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Reassessment Holding Section 153C Applied Instead of Section 147

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad, decided two appeals filed by the assessee against separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Years 2009-10 and 2011-12. The assessee challenged the additions made by the Assessing Officer and also raised additional legal grounds contending that reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act were invalid because the case was governed by the special provisions relating to search and requisition assessments under Sections 153A and 153C.

For Assessment Year 2009-10, the return of income had been processed under Section 143(1). Subsequently, on the basis of information received following proceedings under Section 132A in the cases of Narayan Sai and Asaram Bapu, the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment under Section 147. According to the Revenue, a promissory note relating to a cash loan of ₹20 lakh and an individual ledger allegedly pertaining to the assessee had been found during the search. On examining the seized material, the Assessing Officer concluded that the assessee had repaid ₹6 lakh towards principal and ₹2.14 lakh towards interest during the relevant financial year, which were allegedly not reflected in the books of account. The assessee denied having taken any loan, making any repayment or maintaining any such ledger. As the Assessing Officer found no corroborative evidence supporting the assessee’s explanation, an addition of ₹8,14,200 was made as expenditure incurred from undisclosed sources. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the assessment.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 22,769

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.