Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Devanshi Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Devanshi Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee challenged reopening proceedings relating to alleged bogus LTCG exemption u/s 10(38) from sale of shares, where the AO treated sale proceeds as fictitious and made additions after reopening u/s 147. The primary issue before ITAT was jurisdictional validity of the reassessment initiated through order u/s 148A(d) and notice u/s 148. The Tribunal observed that both the order u/s 148A(d) and notice u/s 148 were issued after expiry of three years from the end of AY 2017-18. As per sec. 151(ii), sanction in such cases must be obtained from PCCIT/CCIT...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930