Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Om Prakash Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Om Prakash Vs ITO (ITAT Agra) Reopening Quashed—AO Recorded Wrong Facts, Wrong Amounts & Even Wrong Name; Mechanical 151 Approval Invalid The Assessee appealed against the NFAC order dated 10.12.2024 sustaining assessment u/s 144 r.w.s.147 dated 23.12.2018. The appeal was filed with a delay of 22 days, which the Tribunal condoned (page 1). 1. Reasons recorded based on completely incorrect facts The AO reopened assessment alleging cash deposits of ₹28,26,470 (as per reasons) and ₹38,56,470 (as per assessment order). However, as seen from the bank statements (pp. 4–5, reproduced in o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930